Skills Reference
beads-superpowers ships 21 composable skills loaded on demand via the Skill tool. The bootstrap skill using-superpowers loads at every session start and routes to the right skill for the current task. Skills are mandatory - when one applies, the agent must invoke it.
A maintainer-only audit skill lives outside the distributed set and isn’t covered here.
Trigger map
Section titled “Trigger map”The using-superpowers bootstrap, injected at session start, tells the agent which skill applies to which task:
| Task | Skill |
|---|---|
| Bug or test failure | systematic-debugging |
| Writing code | test-driven-development |
| New feature or design | brainstorming |
| Stress-test a design | stress-test |
| Writing a plan | writing-plans |
| Executing a plan | subagent-driven-development / executing-plans |
| Research question | research-driven-development |
| Isolated workspace needed | using-git-worktrees |
| About to claim done | verification-before-completion |
| Code review needed | requesting-code-review |
| Received review feedback | receiving-code-review |
| Writing human-facing prose | write-documentation |
| Branch complete | finishing-a-development-branch |
| Consolidate or dedup memories | memory-curator |
| Hand work to the next session | session-handoff (human-invoked) |
Also available: document-release, getting-up-to-speed, dispatching-parallel-agents, project-init
By category
Section titled “By category”| Category | Skills |
|---|---|
| Meta | using-superpowers |
| Testing | test-driven-development |
| Debugging | systematic-debugging, verification-before-completion |
| Design & planning | brainstorming, stress-test, writing-plans |
| Execution | subagent-driven-development, executing-plans, dispatching-parallel-agents, using-git-worktrees, requesting-code-review, receiving-code-review, finishing-a-development-branch |
| Documentation | write-documentation, document-release |
| Memory & orientation | getting-up-to-speed, memory-curator, session-handoff, research-driven-development, project-init |
---
config:
flowchart:
nodeSpacing: 70
rankSpacing: 70
---
graph TD
subgraph Meta
US["using-superpowers"]
end
subgraph Testing
TDD["test-driven-development"]
end
subgraph Debugging
SD["systematic-debugging"]
VBC["verification-before-completion"]
end
subgraph Design ["Design & planning"]
BR["brainstorming"]
STR["stress-test"]
WP["writing-plans"]
end
subgraph Execution
SDD["subagent-driven-dev"]
EP["executing-plans"]
DPA["dispatching-parallel"]
WT["using-git-worktrees"]
RCR["requesting-review"]
REC["receiving-review"]
FAB["finishing-branch"]
end
subgraph Documentation
WD["write-documentation"]
DR["document-release"]
end
subgraph Memory ["Memory & orientation"]
GUS["getting-up-to-speed"]
MC["memory-curator"]
SH["session-handoff"]
RDD["research-driven-dev"]
PI["project-init"]
end
Meta --> Testing
Testing --> Debugging
Debugging --> Design
Design --> Execution
Execution --> Documentation
Documentation --> Memory
style Meta fill:#6366f1,color:#fff
style Testing fill:#22c55e,color:#000
style Debugging fill:#ef4444,color:#fff
style Design fill:#818cf8,color:#fff
style Execution fill:#14b8a6,color:#000
style Documentation fill:#ec4899,color:#fff
style Memory fill:#8b5cf6,color:#fff
All skills
Section titled “All skills”using-superpowers
Section titled “using-superpowers”Bootstrap skill injected at every session start. Routes the agent to the correct skill for the current task, and carries the production-grade doctrine that holds every session to a no-shortcuts, no-silent-descope, never-a-security-regression standard. It also carries the decision-capture convention: when a choice is hard to reverse, surprising, and a genuine trade-off, the agent offers to record an ADR in docs/decisions/. All other skills depend on this one having loaded first.
test-driven-development
Section titled “test-driven-development”Trigger: Before writing any implementation code.
Iron Law: no production code without a failing test first - explicit failing-test output required before touching any implementation. RED-GREEN-REFACTOR, no shortcuts.
systematic-debugging
Section titled “systematic-debugging”Trigger: Any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior - before proposing fixes.
Four-phase root cause analysis: observe, hypothesize, isolate, fix. Requires a confirmed root cause before any code change. Blocks “just try this and see.”
verification-before-completion
Section titled “verification-before-completion”Trigger: Before claiming work is done, fixed, or passing.
The agent must run verification commands and show actual output - not assert from memory - before closing a bead or creating a PR. Evidence before assertions.
brainstorming
Section titled “brainstorming”Trigger: Before any creative work - features, components, or behavior changes.
Socratic design exploration. Asks structured questions to surface requirements, constraints, and design alternatives. Produces a committed design spec. Ends by invoking writing-plans, not by jumping to code.
stress-test
Section titled “stress-test”Trigger: When a design or plan needs adversarial scrutiny. Also triggers on “grill me”, “poke holes”, “challenge this design”.
Interrogates every branch of the decision tree, proposing a recommended answer for each and requiring the user to explicitly agree or push back rather than rubber-stamping the whole set. Tracks branch resolution progress, writes findings inline (Mode A) or to a standalone report (Mode B), and runs a reflexion self-review before closing. Typically runs between brainstorming and writing-plans.
writing-plans
Section titled “writing-plans”Trigger: When you have a spec or requirements for a multi-step task.
Breaks a design into bite-sized tasks (2-5 minutes each) with exact file paths, code, and verification steps. Every task becomes a bead with dependency ordering.
subagent-driven-development
Section titled “subagent-driven-development”Trigger: When executing a plan with independent tasks.
Dispatches a fresh subagent per task with a single read-only task review between tasks - one reviewer returns a spec-compliance verdict and a code-quality verdict in one pass. The orchestrator tracks beads; subagents don’t touch them. When multiple tasks are unblocked, parallel batch mode runs up to 5 concurrently, each in its own worktree.
executing-plans
Section titled “executing-plans”Trigger: When executing a plan in a single session with review checkpoints.
Runs a multi-phase plan sequentially: claim, implement, verify against acceptance criteria, close, next phase. Designed to complement writing-plans output directly.
dispatching-parallel-agents
Section titled “dispatching-parallel-agents”Trigger: When facing 2+ independent tasks without shared state.
Coordinates concurrent subagents for independent work - plan tasks, subsystem changes, anything without shared mutable state. Used by SDD’s parallel batch mode for the dispatch pattern.
using-git-worktrees
Section titled “using-git-worktrees”Trigger: Feature work needing isolation, or before executing plans.
Creates and manages isolated git worktrees via bd worktree. Pre-flight checks detect existing worktree isolation, submodule contexts, and prompt for consent (skipped when SDD-dispatched). Supports multiple concurrent worktrees for parallel subagent work - one per task, max 5. Use bd -C .worktrees/<name> for cross-worktree commands.
requesting-code-review
Section titled “requesting-code-review”Trigger: After completing tasks, major features, or before merging.
Dispatches a code reviewer subagent that checks the diff against the original requirements, reporting strengths, issues grouped by severity, and an overall assessment. The reviewer gets the original requirements alongside the diff.
receiving-code-review
Section titled “receiving-code-review”Trigger: When review feedback arrives, especially if unclear or questionable.
Anti-sycophancy protocol: requires technical evaluation of each suggestion rather than blind acceptance, with disagreements escalated explicitly.
finishing-a-development-branch
Section titled “finishing-a-development-branch”Trigger: Implementation complete, tests pass, ready to integrate.
Detects environment (normal repo, named-branch worktree, or detached HEAD) and adapts options - 4 choices for normal/worktree, 3 for detached HEAD (no merge). A docs-audit gate runs before the options: document-release must have run on the branch, or is invoked on the spot (doc-irrelevant diffs exit cheaply). Provenance-based cleanup only removes .worktrees/ paths. Ends with the mandatory Land the Plane sequence: bd close → bd dolt push → git push.
write-documentation
Section titled “write-documentation”Trigger: Writing or rewriting human-facing prose - docs, guides, emails, PR descriptions, release notes.
14-rule writing system adapted from WRITING.md. Context-first drafting, required checks as revision pass, targets the patterns that make LLM prose recognizable (regularity, catalog prose, false crispness). Pairs with document-release (which handles when to update, not how to write).
document-release
Section titled “document-release”Trigger: Branch complete and about to merge or PR - including via finishing-a-development-branch’s docs-audit gate - after code changes are committed.
Walks through README, CHANGELOG, CLAUDE.md, CONTRIBUTING, and other docs to find and fix drift against shipped code. A coverage map catches docs that are missing entirely - a new flag or command with no reference page - not only stale ones, and each CHANGELOG entry is scored against a what-changed, why-care, how-to-use test.
getting-up-to-speed
Section titled “getting-up-to-speed”Trigger: Session start, after compaction, or “catch me up” / “where are we”.
Gathers beads state and the newest handoff in one orient.sh call, deep-dives the codebase (sub-agent fan-out scales to repo size across <40 / 40-150 / >150 tracked-file bands), and produces a structured current-state summary. It reads the newest .internal/handoff/ doc - written by its counterpart session-handoff - as an unread inbox, folding it into the summary and then archiving it at close so a later session doesn’t re-read it; a HEAD-recency backstop flags a handoff as stale when HEAD has moved past the commit it recorded. A pre-emit verification gate holds every claim in the summary to a command actually run in the session, a beads-versus-git check flags work that shipped but was left open, and superseded continuation-* memories are pruned at close.
memory-curator
Section titled “memory-curator”Trigger: At session-close when several new memories were captured, or on-demand for a full sweep.
Turns a session’s raw bd remember notes into well-structured, deduplicated, consolidated memories using the in-session agent - no runtime, key, or embeddings. The scope is deliberately evidence-led: quality-gated capture, reflection-consolidation, and pruning, not structural richness. It never mutates the store silently - it proposes a reviewed command list, and you approve before anything is written.
session-handoff
Section titled “session-handoff”Human-invoked only. Writes a grounded session-handoff document and stores a bd remember continuation note so the next session can pick up in-progress work without relying on chat history. Its counterpart getting-up-to-speed consumes that document on the next session’s orientation, then archives it.
research-driven-development
Section titled “research-driven-development”Trigger: Research questions, “what is X”, “how does Y work”, “compare A vs B”.
Decomposes the topic into sub-questions, dispatches one researcher per sub-question in parallel (plus @explore for codebase-relevant topics), then grounds every load-bearing claim with a separate blinded verifier that independently re-fetches the cited source and confirms it actually supports the claim before the finding is allowed into the document, and synthesizes the surviving findings into a persistent document with per-finding confidence. Iron Law: no research without a document - verbal answers without persistent artifacts are prohibited.
project-init
Section titled “project-init”Trigger: When bd commands fail, setting up beads in a new project, or recovering from diverged Dolt history.
Three paths: fresh init, bootstrap from remote, or recovery when Dolt history has diverged.
Beads commands
Section titled “Beads commands”Skills use bd commands to track work. Only the orchestrating agent manages beads - subagents don’t touch them.
| Action | Command | Used in |
|---|---|---|
| Create epic | bd create "Epic: name" -t epic |
SDD, executing-plans |
| Create task | bd create "Task: name" -t task --parent <epic> |
SDD, executing-plans |
| Atomic plan creation | bd import (JSONL, after bd create epic) |
writing-plans, SDD |
| Quick capture | bd q "title" |
any skill |
| Claim work | bd update <id> --claim |
executing-plans |
| Complete work | bd close <id> --reason "why" |
all execution skills |
| Check remaining | bd ready --parent <epic> |
SDD, executing-plans |
| Compound query | bd query "status=open AND priority<=1" |
getting-up-to-speed (replaces bd list + jq) |
| Grouped counts | bd count --by-status |
getting-up-to-speed (also --by-priority/--by-type) |
| Add dependency | bd dep add <child> <parent> |
SDD, writing-plans |
| Store learning | bd remember "insight" |
most of the 21 skills prompt for this |
| Attach evidence | bd note <id> "context" |
verification |
| Explain dependencies | bd ready --explain |
systematic-debugging, executing-plans |
| Sync to remote | bd dolt push |
finishing-a-development-branch |
How skills chain
Section titled “How skills chain”---
config:
flowchart:
nodeSpacing: 70
rankSpacing: 70
---
graph TD
US["using-superpowers<br/>(bootstrap)"] --> B["brainstorming"]
US --> TDD["test-driven-development"]
US --> SD["systematic-debugging"]
US --> RDD["research-driven-development"]
US --> WD["write-documentation"]
B -.-> ST["stress-test"]
B --> WP["writing-plans"]
WP --> SDD["subagent-driven-development"]
WP --> EP["executing-plans"]
SDD --> GW["using-git-worktrees"]
SDD --> RCR["requesting-code-review"]
SDD --> SD
SDD --> FAB["finishing-a-development-branch"]
EP --> FAB
style US fill:#6366f1,color:#fff
style FAB fill:#f59e0b,color:#000
style TDD fill:#22c55e,color:#000
style SD fill:#ef4444,color:#fff
Edges show direct skill-to-skill invocations only - transitions managed by the orchestrator (e.g., verification → document-release → finishing) are omitted. Dashed edges are optional. Skills like systematic-debugging, verification-before-completion, and receiving-code-review fire whenever their trigger is met, regardless of workflow position.
Created: 2026-05-02Last updated: 2026-07-19